JB Cup

Other tournament discussions

Re: JB Cup

Postby Lidflipper » Tue May 13, 2014 1:08 am

I don't think its worth it anymore. It's just too limited. I believe it's time for a real League. Matches through-out the year, the best teams/clubs make a playoff scenario. Should have home and away matches etc. Make it ultra inclusive rather than ultra exclusive. I appreciate the spirit the JB cup used to carry, but the cards are stacked for those already in it. TTown had to fight last year to keep their spot, I wonder if Q would have fared the same under last years circumstances.And hell ya we would have ganged up on them. Or conversly, if TTown was given special new last minute rule making abilities. K topics dead to me now.
Long time reader, first time poster
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:30 am

Re: JB Cup

Postby Peter » Tue May 13, 2014 7:00 am

Hey Lidflipper,

Here is a quote from an earlier post by Hank regarding the JB Cup:

The aim of the event is to create a competitive, pressure-packed environment that will raise the level of play for BC’s best players, helping them to successfully compete against other great players such as the top American pros. It is also meant to promote friendship, healthy rivalries, and good sportsmanship under pressure. Finally, it is a reward to those who work hard to better their games.

This is the key point of the tournament and in fact the name BC Club Championships was dropped in favor of the Jim Brown Cup to de-emphasize the 'club' part. This was in fact due to a valid point made by others that it should be open to all BC clubs, regardless of skill, if it is to be called a club championship. We have to restrict the number of teams otherwize we will need a week to run the tournament. We still need a way to qualify new teams (meaning one or more of the original teams will sit out)

That being said, the team=club spirit is still there, it is by far the best way to ensure ringers are not easily added to teams. It also creates great rivalries which definitely increase the competitive juices. I don't want to make this event a general event for the masses, someone else can create their own tournament to do that. Here is another quote from six years ago that shows the concept of what Jas and I wanted:

Any players, regardless of gender, age, race, religion, etc., can earn their way onto a team. The key word here is earn. We need something that will motivate people to practice and to become the best they can be. Will everyone make their team? Of course not. Being a limited event, there will naturally be disappointment for those who do not make it in. Disappointment can lead to two things: 1) Bitterness, or 2) Motivation. Bitterness seldom leads to improved play. Motivation on the other hand will lead to practice, which often leads to success. If you don’t believe me, just ask Dave Ross… Your chances of making your team will be a lot better if you work hard. I know that one day (since I am entering my 44th orbit it may be soon!) I will not make my own team, but I’ve already seen a couple of disc golf playoffs and know I’m in for another great treat as a fan…

This tournament was never meant to be all-inclusive as per the quote above, it was meant to be a means to elevate the play of golf in BC. It is obvious from your post that you enjoyed playing in the Challenge and it appears you feel bitter about not be able to gang up on Q. Lets pretend that you were able to, and that the other three teams managed to beat Q. Would the winning team have earned their place at the JB Cup? The obvious answer is no, instead they would have slid in "through the back door" without earning their place rightfully. How does this fit in with the stated goal of the JB Cup; to create a competitive, pressure-packed environment that will raise the level of play for BC’s best players?

I would respectfully disagree with your statement "Make it ultra inclusive rather than ultra exclusive", this is not the venue for that.

I do however, agree with the concept of a league with matches throughout the year. This event could be all inclusive and allow all teams to participate. Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I read your post correctly, it would seem that you are advocating a head to head match up with the best teams making a playoff scenario. You want that for the league event but not for the JB Cup? As some other posters on the tag board have said......hmmmm

I'm shy
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:05 am

Re: JB Cup

Postby Lidflipper » Tue May 13, 2014 10:39 am

To Peter,

Yes, thats what Im talking about. League for everybody. Some Clubs are big some are growing. I think a lot more beginners would benifit from being on a team. Also to figure out the logistics of a league should be done with all the clubs that want to be involved ie. rules and subsequent changes would have to go through a process to allow input and voting by ALL teams to avoid contraversy and eliminate the possibilty of any hmmm's.
Long time reader, first time poster
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:30 am

Re: JB Cup

Postby Nev_Star » Tue May 13, 2014 11:53 am

The existing teams have worked on strategy and player development for years to even stand a chance to compete at the JB cup.
Now everyone is complaining they cant make it in after trying for a year.
Changes are inevitable and they have to be implemented somewhere and no one will ever be prepared for it.
You are more than welcome to start a league event, or something similar, I believe Craig Sheather had plans to do something similar to your idea while keeping the JB cup intact.

The fact that the JB cup was altered to include the relegation aspect is really cool, it adds dynamic to the JB cup event and opens up the possibilities of a different club making it in.
How that is not more "inclusive" I don't know... it isn't an event for the beginner/average disc golfer, but perhaps an event that will inspire those to grow to become skilled enough to make it.
Which I believe it has.
My 2c
Getting comfortable
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:03 am

Re: JB Cup

Postby chaddydaddy » Tue May 13, 2014 3:12 pm

I don't like the idea of removing the team being challenged from the equation... to have a one-on-one team battle - just because of the logistics of it all.

If you wanna have it all on one weekend, I think it makes sense to include all teams in the usual format that we've been playing... the new change to randomize who's playing who worked quite well and serves to eliminate purposeful stacking against any one team... I think it's an exciting element to have the challenged team in the mix.

To add more teams into the mix, it should be based on ability, not "you finished 3rd or 4th" and now since another couple new teams want in "sorry 'bout your luck"... why not just add in another tier like I mentioned in the other post? It allows for organic expansion (or reduction if only a few teams want to challenge in a given year). Only the bottom team should ever be on the chopping block in each 4 team event, and should only be removed if some other BETTER team deserves that spot.
Getting comfortable
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:24 pm
Location: Surrey


Return to Tournaments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests